Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement
Date
Msg-id 48EA06AA.4030302@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
Responses Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement
List pgsql-hackers
Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Tom Lane a écrit :
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> The trivial fix is to just force a checkpoint in ALTER TABLE SET 
>>> TABLESPACE. Can we do better than that? Perhaps only force a checkpoint 
>>> when we find that the file already exists.
>> If ALTER TABLE SET TABLESPACE is assuming that it can always use the
>> same relfilenode number in the new space as in the old, it's just plain
>> broken.  We need to fix that assumption.
> 
> Do you mean the backend should change the relfilenode number whenever we
> use the ALTER TABLE SET TABLESPACE ? I can't think of a way to get twice
> the same relfilenode.
> 
> Perhaps a better question would be : how the next relfilenode is computed?

1. Get the next OID from the counter.
2. Check if a file with that name exists. If it does, goto 1.

Yeah, seems like we need to allocate a new relfilenode in the new 
tablespace.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement