Interval literal rounding bug(?) and patch. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ron Mayer
Subject Interval literal rounding bug(?) and patch.
Date
Msg-id 48D7F429.8000007@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Interval literal rounding bug(?) and patch.  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I think it's a bug that these 3 different ways of writing 0.7 seconds
produce different results from each other on HEAD.

head=# select interval '0:0:0.7', interval '@ 0.70 secs', interval '0.7 seconds';
   interval   |    interval     |    interval
-------------+-----------------+-----------------
  00:00:00.70 | 00:00:00.699999 | 00:00:00.699999
(1 row)

The attached patch will make all of those output "00:00:00.70" which.

Postgres 8.3 tended to output the "00:00:00.70" like this patch, I believe
because it didn't default to HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP like HEAD is.   The patch
seems to pass the existing regression tests.

Does this seem reasonable?

    Ron


*** a/src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c
--- b/src/backend/utils/adt/datetime.c
***************
*** 2888,2894 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,
                  {
                      case DTK_MICROSEC:
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                         *fsec += val + fval;
  #else
                          *fsec += (val + fval) * 1e-6;
  #endif
--- 2888,2894 ----
                  {
                      case DTK_MICROSEC:
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                         *fsec += rint(val + fval);
  #else
                          *fsec += (val + fval) * 1e-6;
  #endif
***************
*** 2897,2903 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,

                      case DTK_MILLISEC:
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                         *fsec += (val + fval) * 1000;
  #else
                          *fsec += (val + fval) * 1e-3;
  #endif
--- 2897,2903 ----

                      case DTK_MILLISEC:
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                         *fsec += rint((val + fval) * 1000);
  #else
                          *fsec += (val + fval) * 1e-3;
  #endif
***************
*** 2907,2913 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,
                      case DTK_SECOND:
                          tm->tm_sec += val;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                         *fsec += fval * 1000000;
  #else
                          *fsec += fval;
  #endif
--- 2907,2913 ----
                      case DTK_SECOND:
                          tm->tm_sec += val;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                         *fsec += rint(fval * 1000000);
  #else
                          *fsec += fval;
  #endif
***************
*** 2932,2938 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,
                              sec = fval;
                              tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                             *fsec += (fval - sec) * 1000000;
  #else
                              *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
--- 2932,2938 ----
                              sec = fval;
                              tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                             *fsec += rint((fval - sec) * 1000000);
  #else
                              *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
***************
*** 2950,2956 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,
                              sec = fval;
                              tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                             *fsec += (fval - sec) * 1000000;
  #else
                              *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
--- 2950,2956 ----
                              sec = fval;
                              tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                             *fsec += rint((fval - sec) * 1000000);
  #else
                              *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
***************
*** 2969,2975 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,
                              sec = fval;
                              tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                             *fsec += (fval - sec) * 1000000;
  #else
                              *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
--- 2969,2975 ----
                              sec = fval;
                              tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                             *fsec += rint((fval - sec) * 1000000);
  #else
                              *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
***************
*** 2995,3001 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,
                                  sec = fval;
                                  tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                                 *fsec += (fval - sec) * 1000000;
  #else
                                  *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
--- 2995,3001 ----
                                  sec = fval;
                                  tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                                 *fsec += rint((fval - sec) * 1000000);
  #else
                                  *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
***************
*** 3022,3028 **** DecodeInterval(char **field, int *ftype, int nf, int range,
                                  sec = fval;
                                  tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                                 *fsec += (fval - sec) * 1000000;
  #else
                                  *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif
--- 3022,3028 ----
                                  sec = fval;
                                  tm->tm_sec += sec;
  #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
!                                 *fsec += rint((fval - sec) * 1000000);
  #else
                                  *fsec += fval - sec;
  #endif

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial prefetch performance testing