Re: parallel pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: parallel pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 48D7EC8F.1000106@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel pg_restore  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: parallel pg_restore  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: parallel pg_restore  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I will not argue vehemently here but I will say that "jobs" doesn't
>> seem correct. The term "workers" seems more appropriate.
>>     
>
> Agreed, but most utilities have "j" free but not w, p, t or other
> letters that might be synonyms.
>
> j is at least used for exactly this purpose in other tools.
>
>   

There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly 
profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite.

j and m happen to be two of those that are available.

I honestly don't have a terribly strong opinion about what it should be 
called. I can live with jobs or multi-threads.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial prefetch performance testing
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Interval literal rounding bug(?) and patch.