Re: parallel pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: parallel pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 48D8813A.5060202@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel pg_restore  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: parallel pg_restore  ("Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@cuci.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly 
> profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite.
> 
> j and m happen to be two of those that are available.

--max-workers

Max makes sense because the number of workers won't be consistent, a 
worker may not have a job to do. It is also consistent with 
auto_vacuum_max_workers.

Joshua D. Drake

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: FSM, now without WAL-logging
Next
From: "Stephen R. van den Berg"
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore