Re: parallel pg_restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen R. van den Berg
Subject Re: parallel pg_restore
Date
Msg-id 20080923071433.GA28639@cuci.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel pg_restore  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: parallel pg_restore  (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly 
>>profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite.

>>j and m happen to be two of those that are available.

>--max-workers

Perhaps, but please do not use that as justification for using -m.
That would be equally silly as abbreviating "number of workers" to -n.
-- 
Sincerely,          Stephen R. van den Berg.

Experience is something you don't get until just after you need it.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore