Re: code coverage patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: code coverage patch
Date
Msg-id 48B6AF75.7080106@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: code coverage patch  (Korry Douglas <korry.douglas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: code coverage patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Korry Douglas wrote:
>> 1) Use bison's -o option to put the output file in the right place 
>> directly,
>> if we are dealing with bison (and don't bother to support code coverage
>> analysis with other yaccs), or
>>
>> 2) Run a pattern replacement across the grammar output files as their are
>> renamed.
> 
> Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way 
> you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

I think only bison supports that directive.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Korry Douglas
Date:
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: code coverage patch