Re: code coverage patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: code coverage patch
Date
Msg-id 9632.1219933450@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: code coverage patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: code coverage patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Korry Douglas wrote:
>> Why not use the %output directive in the grammar file instead; that way 
>> you don't need to add any special flags to the Makefile.

> I think only bison supports that directive.

We're pretty much assuming bison anyway, no?  It's been years since
I heard of anyone successfully building the backend grammar with plain
yacc.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: code coverage patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: What happend to equality_oper()