Tom Lane wrote:
> We're pretty much assuming bison anyway, no? It's been years since
> I heard of anyone successfully building the backend grammar with plain
> yacc.
In my recollection, you were the last holdout on that with the
occasional HP-UX yacc test. But I seem to recall that that combination
actually no longer worked the last time.
If no one else has any interest in maintaining other-yacc support, then
we might as well drop it.
