Re: argument of AND must not return a set when using regexp_matches - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: argument of AND must not return a set when using regexp_matches
Date
Msg-id 4897.1358378623@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to argument of AND must not return a set when using regexp_matches  (Robert James <srobertjames@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Robert James <srobertjames@gmail.com> writes:
> SELECT (regexp_matches('abc', '(.)b(.)'))[1] IS NOT NULL AND true
> -- Gives this error:
> ERROR: argument of AND must not return a set
> SQL state: 42804

> Can anyone make heads or tails of it? Is it a real bug? Is there a work around?

It's not a bug: regexp_matches returns a set of rows, not a scalar
result.

You might want to stick it into a sub-select as per the trick suggested
in the manual - then you get a NULL rather than zero rows when there's
no match.  (Or, in the particular example at hand, it's not very clear
why you're using regexp_matches at all and not a plain old ~ operator.)

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Charles Porter
Date:
Subject: pg_upgrade problem from 8.4 to 9.2 problems on OSX
Next
From: David Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT... WHERE