Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Looks good for a start, but what is missing in this patch is that mmerror and
> the other functions actually call gettext. So currently this patch doesn't
> achieve a lot.
>
I don't know if I understand what you want to say by "call gettext". A
quick look at the l10n of backend proves that it calls gettext
everywhere. Could you ellaborate?
Based on your feedback I'm working on the second part (overhaul of ecpg
output message functions).
> I suggest you keep working on this, and we will reconsider a more complete
> patch at a later date.
>
Thanks for your feedback. I agree with Tom that it's is a
in-progress-work. I'll send another revision of the first patch later.
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/
