Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit - Mailing list pgsql-performance

Craig Ringer wrote:
> I'll bang out a couple of examples at work tomorrow to see what I land
> up with, since this is clearly something that can benefit from a neat
> test case.

Here's what I used to reproduce this:

postgres=# BEGIN;
BEGIN
postgres=# CREATE TABLE foo (id int4,t text);CREATE TABLE
postgres=# CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION insertfunc() RETURNS void LANGUAGE
plpgsql  AS $$
   begin
     INSERT INTO foo VALUES ( 1, repeat('a',110));
   exception when unique_violation THEN end;
$$;
CREATE FUNCTION
postgres=# SELECT COUNT(insertfunc()) FROM generate_series(1,300000);
count
--------
  300000
(1 row)

postgres=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT COUNT(*) FROM foo;
                                   QUERY PLAN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Aggregate  (cost=13595.93..13595.94 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=239535.904..239535.906 rows=1 loops=1)
    ->  Seq Scan on foo  (cost=0.00..11948.34 rows=659034 width=0)
(actual time=0.022..239133.898 rows=300000 loops=1)
  Total runtime: 239535.974 ms
(3 rows)


The oprofile output is pretty damning:

samples  %        symbol name
42148    99.7468  TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId

If you put a COMMIT right before "EXPLAIN ANALYZE..." it runs in < 1s.

--
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com