Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:32:20AM -0800, Warren Turkal wrote:
>> 1) Is there a reason that header information is duplicated between normal
>> posgresql include and ecpg includes instead of defining the info in one place
>> and #including it into the files that need it?
Merlin and I ran into this question while working on the libpq type system,
found here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-03/msg00057.php
It opens up the binary parameterized interface in libpq by providing data type
converters, to and from external binary format and C data types, when performing
queries or getting results. This required copying and pasting some code from
the backend for a couple types ... like datetime and numeric. We had to work
around several backend compile-time checks by using run-time checks; being how
servers are compiled differently.
The most modular approach would be to abstract the backend/utils/adt API so the
backend and client stuff can share the functionality. We did mention this
during one of our patch submissions, but didn't push it as it is a large change
outside the scope of our patch.
>> As long as both implementations are kept in sync I don't see a reason.
Sharing the backend data type converters with client stuff is an obvious win,
but its a tedious process probably lacking any motivation. We did look at it
though, it is possible.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
