> >> As long as both implementations are kept in sync I don't see a reason.
>
> Sharing the backend data type converters with client stuff is an obvious
> win, but its a tedious process probably lacking any motivation. We did
> look at it though, it is possible.
I thought we were just talking about some definitions. If we were to
move the whole logic into one place we might be facing a
performance penalty inside the backend, maybe not a large one though.
Others around here are better suited to judge this.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
