Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Craig James
Subject Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
Date
Msg-id 475EA754.1090307@emolecules.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
List pgsql-performance
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Craig James wrote:
>> This is driving me crazy.  I have some Postgres C function extensions
>> in a shared library.  They've been working fine.  I upgraded to Fedora
>> Core 6 and gcc4, and now every time psql(1) disconnects from the
>> server, the serverlog gets this message:
>>
>>   *** glibc detected *** postgres: mydb mydb [local] idle: double free or corruption! (!prev): 0x08bfcde8
>
> Do you have any Perl or Python functions or stuff like that?

There is one Perl function, but it is never invoked during this test.  I connect to Postgres, issue one "select
myfunc()",and disconnect. 

>>  Postgres 8.1.4
>
> Please upgrade to 8.1.10 and try again.  If it still fails we will be
> much more interested in tracking it down.

Good idea, but alas, no difference.  I get the same "double free or corruption!" mesage.  I compiled 8.1.10 from source
andinstalled, then rebuilt all of my code from scratch and reinstalled the shared object. Same message as before. 

Here is my guess -- and this is just a guess.  My functions use a third-party library which, of necessity, uses
malloc/freein the ordinary way.  I suspect that there's a bug in the Postgres palloc() code that's walking over memory
thatregular malloc() allocates.  The third-party library (OpenBabel) has been tested pretty thoroughly by me an others
andhas no memory corruption problems.  All malloc's are freed properly.  Does that seem like a possibility? 

I can't figure out how to use ordinary tools like valgrind with a Postgres backend process to track this down.

Thanks,
Craig


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Pallav Kalva
Date:
Subject: Slow Query
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die