Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online
Date
Msg-id 46D5BA93.5060801@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>
>> If we go ahead with this, I'll commit to doing a contrib README
>> cleanup so the doc system works better.
>>
>
> Why wouldn't we just remove the README files altogether?  I can't
> see maintaining duplicate sets of documentation.
>
>
>

Right.

Also, let's recall what has previously been discussed for contrib,
namely that we break it out into standard modules (think Perl standard
modules) and other tools, and that we abandon the wholly misleading
"contrib" name altogether. I really want to see that happen next
release. Getting the modules properly documented is a very important
milestone along the way to getting that done. Maybe then the modules
will be considered more first class citizens (until the buildfarm came
along they were often hardly tested at all).

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online
Next
From: "Mario Gonzalez"
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Contrib modules documentation online