-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Fetter wrote:
>>> If people want to make 'no self approval of your or your companies
>>> items' a new moderation rule, I have no problem with that.
>> Good idea. We have enough people and enough diversity that making
>> this explicit in the moderation rules is reasonable. :)
>>
>> Speaking of which, I'd love to figure out a system whereby I can
>> avoid (the appearance of) similar conflicts of interest in the
>> PostgreSQL Weekly News, as I have been in a position to announce
>> things I've done, are doing, etc., and have never felt comfortable
>> about it. I guess that's a subject for another thread, though.
>
> Disagree. We are not making policy over one person's suggestion here,
> and taken to an extreem, this will slow us down, with zero cases of
> conficts actually causing problems. I would prefer people act
> responsibly rather than add more rules.
Easy Bruce, this is something that the community is discussing and
appears to agree with. Although I do think the PostgreSQL Weekly News on
is kind of offtopic.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGumkXATb/zqfZUUQRAtRKAJ9PDw2y7HY+nH6fk7NjKUXdeBGJoACfSyl9
SByUMkkE8l5cnd4ypDTawTM=
=hH0N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
