On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:08:39PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > David Fetter wrote:
> >>> If people want to make 'no self approval of your or your companies
> >>> items' a new moderation rule, I have no problem with that.
> >> Good idea. We have enough people and enough diversity that making
> >> this explicit in the moderation rules is reasonable. :)
> >>
> >> Speaking of which, I'd love to figure out a system whereby I can
> >> avoid (the appearance of) similar conflicts of interest in the
> >> PostgreSQL Weekly News, as I have been in a position to announce
> >> things I've done, are doing, etc., and have never felt comfortable
> >> about it. I guess that's a subject for another thread, though.
> >
> > Disagree. We are not making policy over one person's suggestion here,
> > and taken to an extreem, this will slow us down, with zero cases of
> > conficts actually causing problems. I would prefer people act
> > responsibly rather than add more rules.
>
> Easy Bruce, this is something that the community is discussing and
> appears to agree with. Although I do think the PostgreSQL Weekly News on
> is kind of offtopic.
Which is why I called for another thread. :)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
