Brar Piening wrote:
> Robert Treat schrieb:
>> That would be nice. Of course none of this seems relevant to hackers,
>> so I'd
> Your'e right - of course.
>
> But sometimes I wish 'hackers' would care a little more about their
> interfaces as the best backend can't be good without good interfaces
> and some of the PostgreSQL-interfaces don't reach the standard they
> are reaching for other databases.
> As a windows-user I still can't drag and drop a Dataset in VS.Net with
> Npgsql and I still have to build a single-threaded perl if i want to
> use DBD::Pg (I know about DBD::PgPP).
>
>
This latter is simply not true.
ActiveState Perl is threaded and DBD::Pg works just fine with it. In
fact, you don't need to build your own - just get the one from pgfoundry:
point your ppm at: http://dbdpgppm.projects.postgresql.org//DBD-Pg-5.8.ppd
cheers
andrew
