Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Gregory Stark wrote:
>>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>>
>> If I have 16 cores, things are still really loud but I start to not be
>> able to tell the difference. The percentage of improvement is much lower.
>>
>> E.g, 16 cores works and PostgreSQL work great, but it is not nearly as
>> fantastic with 16 cores as 8 cores (in terms percentage gain).
>>
> That's not the same thing as slowing down, it just means that scaling
> isn't always linear, which isn't surprising.
Right. Which is why I reposted, but it also makes what Simon proposes
that much more attractive *because* it helps the linear problem (in theory).
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
