Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> static int pam_passwd_conv_proc(int num_msg, const struct pam_message
>> ** msg,
>> struct pam_response ** resp, void *appdata_ptr);
>>
>> which exactly matches what my Fedora 6 pam header file says it should
>> be. What is it on those Solaris machines?
>
> struct pam_conv {
> int (*conv)(int, struct pam_message **,
> struct pam_response **, void *);
> void *appdata_ptr; /* Application data ptr */
> };
>
> So pam_message ** isn't const.
>
Yes, according to X/Open XSSO Standard - see
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/008329799/
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/008329799/pam_start.htm#tagcjh_07_32
Zdenek
