Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> Well assuming we have any SQL-level support at all I think we should
>> strive to avoid these functions taking INTERNAL arguments.
> That gets us down to just needing to worry about whether we like the
> SQL representation of configurations. Which is still a nontrivial
> issue, but at least it seems manageable on a timescale that's
> reasonable for 8.3.
O.k. I am not trying to throw any cold water on this, but with the
limitations we are suggesting, does the patch gain us anything over just
leaving tsearch in contrib?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
