Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> >> Well assuming we have any SQL-level support at all I think we should
> >> strive to avoid these functions taking INTERNAL arguments.
>
> > That gets us down to just needing to worry about whether we like the
> > SQL representation of configurations. Which is still a nontrivial
> > issue, but at least it seems manageable on a timescale that's
> > reasonable for 8.3.
>
> O.k. I am not trying to throw any cold water on this, but with the
> limitations we are suggesting, does the patch gain us anything over just
> leaving tsearch in contrib?
The idea is that common operations like searching and mapping dictionaries
will be easier to do, but the more complex stuff will require catalog
manipulations.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
