Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Matthew T. O'Connor escribió:
>
>> Ok, but I think the question posed is that in say a virtual hosting
>> environment there might be say 1,000 databases in the cluster.
That is uhmmm insane... 1000 databases?
Joshua D. Drake
Am I
>> still going to have to wait a long time for my database to get vacuumed?
>> I don't think this has changed much no?
>
> Depends on how much time it takes to vacuum the other 999 databases.
> The default max workers is 3.
>
>> (If default naptime is 1 minute, then autovacuum won't even look at a
>> given database but once every 1,000 minutes (16.67 hours) assuming that
>> there isn't enough work to keep all the workers busy.)
>
> The naptime is per database. Which means if you have 1000 databases and
> a naptime of 60 seconds, the launcher is going to wake up every 100
> milliseconds to check things up. (This results from 60000 / 1000 = 60
> ms, but there is a minimum of 100 ms just to keep things sane).
>
> If there are 3 workers and each of the 1000 databases in average takes
> 10 seconds to vacuum, there will be around 3000 seconds between autovac
> runs of your database assuming my math is right.
>
> I hope those 1000 databases you put in your shared hosting are not very
> big.
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
