Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dann Corbit
Subject Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Date
Msg-id D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F89441547010006FA@postal.corporate.connx.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Joshua D. Drake
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:49 PM
> To: Alvaro Herrera
> Cc: Matthew T. O'Connor; Jim C. Nasby; Michael Paesold; Tom Lane; Andrew
> Hammond; Peter Eisentraut; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of
> postmaster immediately
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Matthew T. O'Connor escribió:
> >
> >> Ok, but I think the question posed is that in say a virtual hosting
> >> environment there might be say 1,000 databases in the cluster.
>
> That is uhmmm insane... 1000 databases?

Not in a test environment.  We have several hundred databases here.  Of course, only a few dozen (or at most ~100) are
ofany one type, but I can imagine that under certain circumstances 1000 databases would not be unreasonable. 

[snip]



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dann Corbit"
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with factorial operator
Next
From: "Cui Shijun"
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with factorial operator