Re: HIPPA (was Re: Anyone know ...) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Kenneth Downs
Subject Re: HIPPA (was Re: Anyone know ...)
Date
Msg-id 45F18525.3010002@secdat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HIPPA (was Re: Anyone know ...)  (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: HIPPA (was Re: Anyone know ...)
Re: HIPPA (was Re: Anyone know ...)
Re: HIPPA (was Re: Anyone know ...)
List pgsql-general
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:08:11AM -0500, Kenneth Downs wrote:
 
First, security is defined directly in terms of tables, it is not 
arbitrated by code.  The "public" group has SELECT access to the 
articles table and the schedules tables, that's it.  If a person figures 
out how our links work and tries to access the "claims" table it will 
simply come up blank (and we get an email).   
How ?

Karsten 


If a user has not logged in, that is, if they are an anonymous visitor, the web framework will connect to the database as the default "public" user.  Our system is deny-by-default, so this user cannot actually read from any table unless specifically granted permission.  In the case being discussed, the public user is given SELECT permission on some columns of the insurance carriers table, and on the schedules table.

The column-level security is important, as you don't want anybody seeing the provider id!

If the user figures out our URL scheme, they might try something like "?gp_page=patients" and say "Wow I'm clever I'm going to look at the patients table", except that the public user has no privilege on the table.  The db server will throw a permission denied error.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jorge Godoy
Date:
Subject: Re: one-to-one schema design question and ORM
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: security permissions for functions