Re: supporting 2000 simultaneous connections. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: supporting 2000 simultaneous connections.
Date
Msg-id 45E6FEBA.5000506@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: supporting 2000 simultaneous connections.  (Hannes Dorbath <light@theendofthetunnel.de>)
List pgsql-general
Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> On 28.02.2007 07:15, Shiva Sarna wrote:
>> The client want us to support 2000 simultaneous users. My question is
>> will there be any performance degradation if I increase the
>> max_connections of pgsql to 2000.
>
> Consider using a connection pool..

But to answer the question, it entirely depends on your hardware. I
wouldn't try this with less than 16Gig of ram and 4-8 cores.

Joshua D. Drake

>


--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: Can I getting a unique ID from a select
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: creating a function with a variable table name