Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Zdenek Kotala
Subject Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date
Msg-id 45E42730.1010606@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
List pgsql-bugs
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
>> comments.
>
> The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with
> Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?".  I don't think "Can I use
> this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar
> interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".
>

You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have
bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only
warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it.

If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it.

        Zdenek

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3079: pg_dump doesn't dump datascheme with uppercase letters in
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut