Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date
Msg-id 200702271910.l1RJAMf23363@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-bugs
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> >> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> >> comments.
> >
> > The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with
> > Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?".  I don't think "Can I use
> > this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar
> > interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".
> >
>
> You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have
> bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only
> warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it.
>
> If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it.

OK, removed.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut
Next
From: Janar Kartau
Date:
Subject: pg_autovacuum and REINDEX at the same time (?)