Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Date
Msg-id 45C374DC.6080609@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
Responses Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
List pgsql-general
>> But it's also important to point out that a number of community
>> members are on the hook to support old versions due to their day
>> jobs; with Tom/Red Hat/7.3 (or is it 7.4?) probably being the best
>> example. IIRC Sun's support policy is 5 years, so presumably someone
>> will have to maintain whatever version they initially shipped with
>> (8.1?) for quite some time as well.
>
> Right.  and my original point in starting this thread is that it would
> be valuable to the community if all this information were gathered up
> and documented somewhere.

Go for it! :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>


--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: DBMS Engines and Performance
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: DBMS Engines and Performance