Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
Date
Msg-id 20070202124247.428960df.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
In response to "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>:
>
> >> But it's also important to point out that a number of community
> >> members are on the hook to support old versions due to their day
> >> jobs; with Tom/Red Hat/7.3 (or is it 7.4?) probably being the best
> >> example. IIRC Sun's support policy is 5 years, so presumably someone
> >> will have to maintain whatever version they initially shipped with
> >> (8.1?) for quite some time as well.
> >
> > Right.  and my original point in starting this thread is that it would
> > be valuable to the community if all this information were gathered up
> > and documented somewhere.
>
> Go for it! :)

I suppose I should have seen that coming ... :)

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: DBMS Engines and Performance
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: large document multiple regex