On 3/19/23 20:31, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 05:41:11PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>>> * Patch 2 is worth considering to backpatch
>>
>> I'm not quite sure what exactly are the numbered patches, as some of the
>> threads had a number of different patch ideas, and I'm not sure which
>> one was/is the most promising one.
>
> patch 2 is referring to the list of patches that was compiled
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20230310195114.6d0c5406%40karst
Ah, I see - it's just the "rebalancing" patch which minimizes the total
amount of memory used (i.e. grow work_mem a bit, so that we don't
allocate too many files).
Yeah, I think that's the best we can do without reworking how we spill
data (slicing or whatever).
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
