Tom Lane wrote:
> Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au> writes:
>
>> I got this error the other day, I was under the impression that vacuum could get a concurrently updated tuple. I
couldbe wrong. It is possible for somebody to quickly explain this situation? Message follows;
>>
>
>
>> vacuumdb: vacuuming of table "school.person" in database "sqlfilter" failed: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated
>>
>
> Was this a VACUUM ANALYZE, and if so might there have been another
> ANALYZE running concurrently on that table? If so, this is just a
> reflection of concurrent attempts to update the same pg_statistic
> row. It's harmless since the ANALYZE that didn't fail presumably
> stored pretty nearly the same results. There is some interlocking
> to prevent the error in CVS HEAD, though.
>
Thanks Tom, that makes a lot on sense. There is an analyze in that.
Plus 8.1 autovac probably got its hand in at the same time. I didn't
expect it to give the error about the vacuumed table if pg_statistic was
the table having the concurrent update. I will remember that for the
future. Thanks again for the fast and concise response.
Russell Smith
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/
>
>
>
