Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zdenek Kotala
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date
Msg-id 4522C898.7050207@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> Also should installation.sgml
>> mention the issueswith building 32 vs 64 bit binaries
> 
> I'm not convinced there is an issue.  dtrace will build the right 
> binaries by default.  If you're messing with mixed environments *and* 
> delve into dtrace, you should probably be able to figure this out 
> yourself.
> 
>> and/or the issue with static functions?
> 
> The issue with that is simply that there is no released operating system 
> version for which the dtrace support works.  I'm not sure what to do 
> about that.
> 

Peter, dtrace is part of Solaris 10 as well. Latest version of 
opensolaris does not have this problem, but Solaris 10 will solve this 
in the update 3.
    Zdenek


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MSVC build broken (again)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MSVC build broken (again)