Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch
Date
Msg-id 200610031620.19979.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch  (Robert Lor <Robert.Lor@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat wrote:
> Also should installation.sgml
> mention the issueswith building 32 vs 64 bit binaries

I'm not convinced there is an issue.  dtrace will build the right 
binaries by default.  If you're messing with mixed environments *and* 
delve into dtrace, you should probably be able to figure this out 
yourself.

> and/or the issue with static functions?

The issue with that is simply that there is no released operating system 
version for which the dtrace support works.  I'm not sure what to do 
about that.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: mark@mark.mielke.cc
Date:
Subject: Re: Faster StrNCpy
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Faster StrNCpy