Hi, Tom,
Markus Schaber wrote:
>>> This lead me to the question whether it is possible to use "internal" as
>>> state type for an Aggregate whose functions are implemented in C.
>> No, because the system has no idea what the representation of an
>> "internal" state value might be, and in particular how to copy it.
>> The same goes for other pseudotypes.
> Ah, I see. So there's no possibility to pass some void* kind of
> intermediate data, I have to craft at least a dummy PostgreSQL datatype
> for it.
> This also solves the question how such things would be cleaned up in
> case of an intermediate error.
As we are at it:
How would you estimate the chances for a Patch to get included that lets
C functions pass some void* data pointer around in an aggregate, when
the aggregate provides a custom "clean-up" function that gets called
whenever the scan gets aborted prematurely?
I assume that this could help speeding up e. G. Array Aggregates, or
PostGIS geomUnion() or string concatenations etc.
Thanks,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org
