On 24.03.21 18:58, John Naylor wrote:
> > As a potential follow-up, should we perhaps add named arguments? That
> > might make the invocations easier to read, depending on taste.
>
> I think it's quite possible some users will prefer that. All we need is
> to add something like
>
> proargnames => '{bin_width,input,origin}'
>
> to the catalog, right?
right, plus some documentation adjustments perhaps
> Also, I noticed that I put in double semicolons in the new functions
> somehow. I'll fix that as well.
I have fixed that.
