Re: regresssion script hole - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: regresssion script hole
Date
Msg-id 4496B1A8.6090205@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: regresssion script hole  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Oh, I think I see the problem:
>
> 8.0 pg_regress:
>
>     if [ "$unix_sockets" = no ]; then
>         postmaster_options="$postmaster_options -c listen_addresses=$hostname"
>     else
>         postmaster_options="$postmaster_options -c listen_addresses=''"
>     fi
>
> 8.1 pg_regress:
>
>     if [ "$unix_sockets" = no ]; then
>         postmaster_options="$postmaster_options -c listen_addresses=$hostname"
>     else
>         postmaster_options="$postmaster_options -c listen_addresses="
>     fi
>
>     
>   

Good catch! I'm impressed! This is surely the heart of the problem.

That change (from rev 1.56) clearly needs to be backported to 8.0.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: regresssion script hole
Next
From: "Bort, Paul"
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking stats communication mechanisms