Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date
Msg-id 446E3590.20309@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
List pgsql-advocacy
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Yes and no... should MySQL eventually become popular enough that there's
>> little use of PostgreSQL that hurts the community just as much as it
>> hurts our companies. In fact, I'd say it's already hurting the community
>> more than our companies; look at how many people lament about running
>> software XYZ because it only supports MySQL. Or about trying to find
>> PostgreSQL hosting providers.
>
> With Linux, it was open for developers to join in, and that fueled its
> growth.  In fact, some say Linux gained only because it was more open
> the *BSD.

I would agree with this. BSD at one time made Linux look like a toy. If
the *core* of the BSD teams would have been more open in there
development, linux would probably be relegated to also ran status.

   Fortunately for us, MySQL foster open development, which
> means they will never catch us in the long run.
>


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: OO PostgreSQL Driver
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: OO PostgreSQL Driver