Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Structure for the human-consumable output or for something that would be
> machine-parsed? ISTM it would be best to keep the current output as-is,
> and provide some other means for producing machine-friendly output,
> presumably in a table format.
How about (well-formed) XML format?
Anyone menthioned in the past threads?
I guess XML is good for the explain structure.
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <nagayasus@nttdata.co.jp>