On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:39:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Akshat Nair" <akshat.nair@gmail.com> writes:
> > Can I get the grammar for the explain output?
>
> There isn't one, it's just text and subject to change at a moment's
> notice :-(. The past proposals that we format it a bit more rigidly
> have so far foundered for lack of a workable definition of what the
> structure should be. It's still an open problem to devise that
> definition.
Structure for the human-consumable output or for something that would be
machine-parsed? ISTM it would be best to keep the current output as-is,
and provide some other means for producing machine-friendly output,
presumably in a table format.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
