Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:31:13AM +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote:
>
>
>>No, cancelling the sleep works (at least for Unix). Isn't cancelling
>>implemented via a signal that interrupts select() ?
>>
>>Anyway, I've changed it, removing the ~2000s limit is a good point.
>>+ while (secs > 1.0)
>>+ {
>>+ pg_usleep(1000000);
>>+ CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
>>+ secs -= 1.0;
>>+ }
>>
>>
>
>Won't this result in a call to pg_sleep with a long sleep time ending up
>sleeping noticeably longer than requested?
>
>
Looks like it to me.
Instead of using a counter it might be better to set a target end time
and check that against the value returned from time() or gettimeofday().
cheers
andrew
