On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:31:13AM +0100, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> No, cancelling the sleep works (at least for Unix). Isn't cancelling
> implemented via a signal that interrupts select() ?
>
> Anyway, I've changed it, removing the ~2000s limit is a good point.
> + while (secs > 1.0)
> + {
> + pg_usleep(1000000);
> + CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
> + secs -= 1.0;
> + }
Won't this result in a call to pg_sleep with a long sleep time ending up
sleeping noticeably longer than requested?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
