Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Date
Msg-id 439E2E48.8070602@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
Responses Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
List pgsql-advocacy
>>>Interesting article; author's bias for Oracle got overturned by us:
>>>http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/oracle/115560
>>
>>Not hardly.  Lewis is a hard-core Oracle geek.   But open-minded.  He and I
>>have been debating OSS vs. Proprietary databases on ITToolbox.com for some
>>time.
>
>
> Well, ok, maybe his bias wasn't overturned, but we still came out ahead
> despite it.

How come he tested 8.0 and not 8.1? Is it an old article?

Chris


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5