Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Date
Msg-id 20051213022303.GH24605@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>>Interesting article; author's bias for Oracle got overturned by us:
> >>>http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/oracle/115560
> >>
> >>Not hardly.  Lewis is a hard-core Oracle geek.   But open-minded.  He and
> >>I have been debating OSS vs. Proprietary databases on ITToolbox.com for
> >>some time.
> >
> >
> >Well, ok, maybe his bias wasn't overturned, but we still came out ahead
> >despite it.
>
> How come he tested 8.0 and not 8.1? Is it an old article?

Judging by the date on the comments, it's from May at the latest.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Next
From: Robert Bernier
Date:
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5