Yes for the love of god do it :D
David Fetter wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Before I dive into this, is there some reason why the pg_catalog.*
> tables/views should not have comments that match the descriptions in
> the docs? I can see where this could cause some maintenance issues,
> and those probably need to be addressed, but it sure would be nice if
> \d+ pg_depend pulled up something like:
>
> Table "pg_catalog.pg_depend"
> Column | Type | Modifiers | Description
> -------------+---------+-----------+-------------
> classid | oid | not null | The OID of the system catalog the dependent object is in
> objid | oid | not null | The OID of the specific dependent object
> objsubid | integer | not null | For a table column, this is the column number (the objid and classid refer to
thetable itself). For all other object types, this column is zero.
> refclassid | oid | not null | The OID of the system catalog the referenced object is in
> refobjid | oid | not null | The OID of the specific referenced object
> refobjsubid | integer | not null | For a table column, this is the column number (the refobjid and refclassid
referto the table itself). For all other object types, this column is zero.
> deptype | "char" | not null | A code defining the specific semantics of this dependency relationship; see
text.
>
> Cheers,
> D
