On 06/06/2018 11:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Yeah, somebody else made a similar point upthread. I guess we felt that
>> the proper procedure was obvious given the structure, but maybe not.
>> I could support adding text to clarify this, perhaps along the line of
>
> Hmm ... actually, there's another special case that's not discussed,
> which is what happens if a committee or core member wants to file a
> complaint against someone else? They certainly shouldn't get to rule
> on their own complaint. So maybe change "complaint against" to
> "complaint by or against" in my proposed addition, and then we're good.
Well that is a standard conflict of interest issue. Having simple
language that says something such as:
A Member involved in complaints may not vote/rule on issues reported by
the respective member.
JD
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
