Re: "Vacuum Full Analyze" taking so long - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From John A Meinel
Subject Re: "Vacuum Full Analyze" taking so long
Date
Msg-id 42E5763C.7030804@arbash-meinel.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "Vacuum Full Analyze" taking so long  ("Tomeh, Husam" <htomeh@firstam.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tomeh, Husam wrote:
>
> Nothing was running except the job. The server did not look stressed out
> looking at top and vmstat. We have seen slower query performance when
> performing load tests, so I run the re-index on all application indexes
> and then issue a full vacuum. I ran the same thing on a staging server
> and it took less than 12 hours. Is there a possibility the DB pages are
> corrupted. Is there a command to verify that. (In Oracle, there's a
> dbverify command that checks for corruption on the data files level).
>
> The other question I have. What would be the proper approach to rebuild
> indexes. I re-indexes and then run vacuum/analyze. Should I not use the
> re-index approach, and instead, drop the indexes, vacuum the tables, and
> then create the indexes, then run analyze on tables and indexes??

I *think* if you are planning on dropping the indexes anyway, just drop
them, VACUUM ANALYZE, and then recreate them, I don't think you have to
re-analyze after you have recreated them.

John
=:->

>
> Thanks,
>
>


Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY insert performance
Next
From: Jochem van Dieten
Date:
Subject: Re: "Vacuum Full Analyze" taking so long