Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Oliver Jowett
Subject Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Date
Msg-id 42DE4944.3010302@opencloud.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer wrote:
> Yes, it does, my mistake ( It was early here )
>
> However reading the notes about setTimestamp:
>
> When the DBMS does not store timezone information the driver will use
> cal to construct a JDBC Timestamp value.
> If no Calendar object is specified the driver uses the timezone of  the
> JVM.

Where's this from exactly? It doesn't seem to make sense if it's talking
about setTimestamp -- the driver does not construct a JDBC timestamp in
setTimestamp at all, it's given one by the application.

-O

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux