Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Date
Msg-id 382ECA12-12A3-4545-9F37-0F63B0E16CD3@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Same book

JDBC API Tutorial 3rd Edition
pg 676

In fact we do this now..

On 20-Jul-05, at 8:53 AM, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Yes, it does, my mistake ( It was early here )
>> However reading the notes about setTimestamp:
>> When the DBMS does not store timezone information the driver will
>> use  cal to construct a JDBC Timestamp value.
>> If no Calendar object is specified the driver uses the timezone
>> of  the JVM.
>>
>
> Where's this from exactly? It doesn't seem to make sense if it's
> talking about setTimestamp -- the driver does not construct a JDBC
> timestamp in setTimestamp at all, it's given one by the application.
>
> -O
>
>


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Streaming ResultSet