Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Oliver Jowett
Subject Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Date
Msg-id 42DCFB05.90306@opencloud.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Dave Cramer wrote:

> by typing it as UNKNOWN we are letting the backend decide what to do
> with it. There is considerable code in there to do the "right" thing.

So you are suggesting we type all parameters as UNKNOWN regardless of
which setXXX() accessor was used to set them?

If not, why is setString() special?

-O

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux